THE REAL SCIENCE BEHIND AuroraTek

Warp Drive Methodologies

By William S. Alek

President and CEO

February 4, 2018

President and CEO

February 4, 2018

By William S. Alek

President and CEO

March 10, 2016

President and CEO

March 10, 2016

The diagram below shows the solution to the Dirac Equation, *E = ±mc*^{2}. The mass of an electron can either have a Positive Mass that can exist only in Real 3-Dimensional Space or a Negative Mass that can exist only in Imaginary 3-Dimensional Space. This means the phase of Dirac electrons are capable of rotating a full 720º. In other words, rotation of 360º can occur in Real 3D Space for a Positive Mass or rotation of 360º can occur in Imaginary 3D Space for a Negative Mass. The Dirac wave function of an electron permits this rotation to happen.

Likewise, Positive Energy (i.e., Photons) can only exist in Real 3D Space and can only be Time-Forward. Negative Energy (i.e., Anti-Photons) can only exist in Imaginary 3D Space and can only be Time-Reversed.

Likewise, Positive Energy (i.e., Photons) can only exist in Real 3D Space and can only be Time-Forward. Negative Energy (i.e., Anti-Photons) can only exist in Imaginary 3D Space and can only be Time-Reversed.

Einstein's
Space-Time as described in General Relativity (1915) has no more than 4-Dimensions.
This includes 3-Dimensions of Real Space and the Time-Forward Domain of
Time. Einstein's Space-Time can only describe a gravity well or Negative Curvature created by a Positive Mass as shown below.

To describe an anti-gravity hill or Positive Curvature created by a
Negative Mass, Einstein's General Relativity must be extended into Time-Reversed Imaginary 3D
Space. In 1994, Miguel Alcubierre proposed a method for traveling Faster Than Light (FTL). As shown below, the Alcubierre Warp Drive for example requires the use of a Negative Mass that creates a Positive Curvature in Space-Time behind the Star Ship as well as a Positive Mass that creates a Negative Curvature in front of the Ship.

The Ship simply moves forward by falling in the direction of greatest Positive/Negative Curvature. In this case, Positive Curvature causes a "push" effect (YIN) and Negative Curvature causes a "pull" effect (YANG).

By William S. Alek

President and CEO

January 28, 2016

President and CEO

January 28, 2016

Given the speed of light ,The fundamental particle solution to the Dirac Equation introduced in 1928 reveals the following:

For a particle at rest, its' momentum is zero, or:

Therefore,

There are only two perfectly valid "symmetric" solutions for this equation. The rest mass of the particle can have a "positive" mass or a "negative" mass. A "positive" mass results in a particle having "positive" energy and a "negative" mass results in the particle having "negative" energy.

The "positive" and "negative" energy solution requires the existence of a multidimensional universe where the "positive" energy resides in Real 3D space (i.e.*x, y, z*) and the "negative" solution resides in Imaginary 3D space (i.e.* jx, jy, jz*). With an added dimension of time *t*, it is suggested we exist in a universe with at least seven dimensions:

For a particle at rest, its' momentum is zero, or:

Therefore,

There are only two perfectly valid "symmetric" solutions for this equation. The rest mass of the particle can have a "positive" mass or a "negative" mass. A "positive" mass results in a particle having "positive" energy and a "negative" mass results in the particle having "negative" energy.

The "positive" and "negative" energy solution requires the existence of a multidimensional universe where the "positive" energy resides in Real 3D space (i.e.

After Dr. Paul Dirac published his breakthrough equation, the scientific establishment made every attempt to "dismiss" the "negative" energy portion of the solution. In 1947, the "Feynman-Stueckelberg Interpretation" was published without any experimental proof, which stated, "A negative energy solution represents a negative energy particle traveling backwards in time, or equivalently, a positive energy antiparticle going forwards in time." According to this interpretation, simply changing the charge state of a particle accounts for the direction of time. First, there is no proof whatsoever this alleged interpretation is true and second, it will become clear later in this article as to why this interpretation is completely false.

The diagram below shows both the "Positive" sea as well as the "Negative" sea of energy. Both seas are symmetrical about a dividing line or boundary called Zero Point, which has a temperature of zero degrees Kelvin.

The diagram below shows both the "Positive" sea as well as the "Negative" sea of energy. Both seas are symmetrical about a dividing line or boundary called Zero Point, which has a temperature of zero degrees Kelvin.

Near Zero Point, Boson Spin '0' macro particle formations are known to occur. These particles demonstrate superconductivity with zero resistance. According to Dirac, the Zero Point region is filled with Electron / Positron pairs or epos, which is another type of Boson Spin '0' macro particle. The epos or electromagnetic aether has net zero mass and their net angular momentum also vanishes. The efficiency of electrical devices becomes 100% at Zero Point.

In addition, at Zero Point, Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity (1905) no longer becomes a barrier to motion because net particle mass is zero. Therefore, particles have zero net momentum and Faster Than Light (FTL) travel or "Quantum Tunneling Through Vast Distances of Space" becomes a reality.

Given the Rest Mass and gamma (introduced in Special Relativity) of a Time-Forward Electron in Real 3D space, compute the new Electron Mass in motion:

In addition, at Zero Point, Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity (1905) no longer becomes a barrier to motion because net particle mass is zero. Therefore, particles have zero net momentum and Faster Than Light (FTL) travel or "Quantum Tunneling Through Vast Distances of Space" becomes a reality.

Given the Rest Mass and gamma (introduced in Special Relativity) of a Time-Forward Electron in Real 3D space, compute the new Electron Mass in motion:

As shown below, in the Dirac Particle Model of the Universe, there are only four electron particle types. Each type has two properties - State and Phase. The State refers to the charge of the particle, which can be either Positive (Positron) or Negative (Electron). The Phase refers to whether the particle is either Time-Forward or Time-Reversed. A Time-Forward particle can only exist in Real 3D space and have Positive Mass. A Time-Reversed particle can only exist in Imaginary 3D space and have Negative Mass. A Negative Mass can't exist in Real 3D space. Haisch and Rueda (1997) also insist that Negative Mass is impossible in Real 3D space, since Mass is a result of the action of the ZPF on polarizable entities. Therefore, the "Feynman-Stueckelberg Interpretation" can't possibly be valid.

As shown above, AuroraTek has developed a patent-pending technology that can "flip" the Phase property of an Electron. Thus, transforming a Time-Forward Electron into a Time-Reversed Electron using what is called a "Spin-Zero Core" configuration. This core configuration blocks the Real Magnetic Field of the Time-Forward Electron in 3D space forcing the Phase to rotate into Imaginary 3D space. The Mass of the Electron becomes Negative; however, the Charge remains the same.

The "Spin-Zero Core" configuration represents a type of Spin-Zero Transformer. The operating performance of this transformer is shown below:

The "Spin-Zero Core" configuration represents a type of Spin-Zero Transformer. The operating performance of this transformer is shown below:

The magnetic field produced by the Electron current flow through the Spin-Zero Core forces the same Electron to phase change or rotate from the real dimension to the imaginary dimension causing the real observable magnetic portion of the field to almost completely vanish. The remaining portion of the field, which is mostly in the imaginary dimension, represents the Time-Reversed Negative Energy component. This component is completely non-observable or hidden from measurement. Therefore, very large power gains or COPs exceeding a 1,000 to 1 between the output and input are measured. This permits the construction of self-sustainable FREE Energy / Overunity devices with phenomenally large observable power gains.

RECOMMENDED READING: Dirac's Theory of Everything

By D.L. Hotson

Infinite Energy Magazine, 2002

Infinite Energy Magazine, 2002

William Alek's comment: Brilliant articles by Hotson! A MUST read!

Diamagnetic Materials

By William S. Alek

President and CEO

June 11, 2015

President and CEO

June 11, 2015

Diamagnetic materials create an induced magnetic field in a direction opposite to an externally applied magnetic field, and are repelled by the applied magnetic field.

Diamagnetic materials cause lines of magnetic flux to curve away from the material. Specifically, an external magnetic field alters the orbital velocity of electrons around their nuclei, thus changing the magnetic dipole moment.

The orbital motion of electrons around atoms creates tiny Amperian current loops, which produce magnetic fields. These electrons form in pairs and occupy the same orbital configuration. According to the Pauli Exclusion Principle, the two electrons must have different spin quantum numbers. One electron is "spin-up" and the other electron is "spin-down." By adding their spin quantum numbers together, the total spin in an electron orbital configuration can be determined. Whenever two electrons are paired together, their total spin is zero, and therefere, they are called**diamagnetic electrons**. If all of the electrons in an atom are paired up, or share their orbital path configuration with another electron, then the total spin in each orbital configuration is zero and the atom is diamagnetic.

When an external magnetic field is applied to a material, these current loops tend to align in such a way as to oppose the applied field, which is an atomic version of Lenz's law: induced magnetic fields tend to oppose the change that created them. All materials are inherently diamagnetic, but if the atoms have some net magnetic moment due to an unpaired electron, the material is paramagnetic. If there is long-range ordering of atomic magnetic moments as in ferromagnetic materials, these stronger effects are always dominant.

Diamagnetic materials have a relative magnetic permeability that is less than 1, thus a magnetic susceptibility which is less than 0, and are therefore repelled by magnetic fields. Copper, for example has a susceptibility of -1.0x10^{-5}. The most strongly diamagnetic materials are Bismuth with a susceptibility of -1.66x10^{-4} and Pyrolytic Carbon with a susceptibility of -4.00x10^{-4} in one plane.

Any electrical conductor will show a strong diamagnetic effect in the presence of changing magnetic fields. The Lorentz force acting on electrons causes the circulating current loops to be generated in the conductor that oppose the magnetic field changes.

A superconductor is a perfect diamagnet since there is no electrical resistance to the forming of the current loops and fully expels internal magnetic fields when cooled below a characteristic critical temperature. It has a magnetic susceptibility of a -1.

Diamagnetic materials cause lines of magnetic flux to curve away from the material. Specifically, an external magnetic field alters the orbital velocity of electrons around their nuclei, thus changing the magnetic dipole moment.

The orbital motion of electrons around atoms creates tiny Amperian current loops, which produce magnetic fields. These electrons form in pairs and occupy the same orbital configuration. According to the Pauli Exclusion Principle, the two electrons must have different spin quantum numbers. One electron is "spin-up" and the other electron is "spin-down." By adding their spin quantum numbers together, the total spin in an electron orbital configuration can be determined. Whenever two electrons are paired together, their total spin is zero, and therefere, they are called

When an external magnetic field is applied to a material, these current loops tend to align in such a way as to oppose the applied field, which is an atomic version of Lenz's law: induced magnetic fields tend to oppose the change that created them. All materials are inherently diamagnetic, but if the atoms have some net magnetic moment due to an unpaired electron, the material is paramagnetic. If there is long-range ordering of atomic magnetic moments as in ferromagnetic materials, these stronger effects are always dominant.

Diamagnetic materials have a relative magnetic permeability that is less than 1, thus a magnetic susceptibility which is less than 0, and are therefore repelled by magnetic fields. Copper, for example has a susceptibility of -1.0x10

Any electrical conductor will show a strong diamagnetic effect in the presence of changing magnetic fields. The Lorentz force acting on electrons causes the circulating current loops to be generated in the conductor that oppose the magnetic field changes.

A superconductor is a perfect diamagnet since there is no electrical resistance to the forming of the current loops and fully expels internal magnetic fields when cooled below a characteristic critical temperature. It has a magnetic susceptibility of a -1.

Diamagnetic Electron pairing in Bismuth.

Magnetic Susceptibilities (x 0.00001) of Diamagnetic Materials at 20°C

Superconductor ............................................................ -100000.0

Pyrolytic Carbon ........................................................... -40.9

Bismuth ......................................................................... -16.6

Silicon ........................................................................... -4.2

Mercury ......................................................................... -2.9

Silver ............................................................................. -2.6

Carbon (diamond) ....................................................... -2.1

Carbon (graphite) ........................................................ -1.6

Lead .............................................................................. -1.8

Sodium chloride ........................................................... -1.4

Copper .......................................................................... -1.0

Water ............................................................................. -0.91

Quartz ............................................................................ -0.62

Ammonia ....................................................................... -0.26

Magnetic susceptibility (latin: susceptibilis “receptive”) is a dimensionless proportionality constant that indicates the degree of magnetization of a material in response to an applied magnetic field.

Superconductor ............................................................ -100000.0

Pyrolytic Carbon ........................................................... -40.9

Bismuth ......................................................................... -16.6

Silicon ........................................................................... -4.2

Mercury ......................................................................... -2.9

Silver ............................................................................. -2.6

Carbon (diamond) ....................................................... -2.1

Carbon (graphite) ........................................................ -1.6

Lead .............................................................................. -1.8

Sodium chloride ........................................................... -1.4

Copper .......................................................................... -1.0

Water ............................................................................. -0.91

Quartz ............................................................................ -0.62

Ammonia ....................................................................... -0.26

Magnetic susceptibility (latin: susceptibilis “receptive”) is a dimensionless proportionality constant that indicates the degree of magnetization of a material in response to an applied magnetic field.

Carbon

Silicon

Copper

Mercury

The Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Analysis

By William S. Alek

President and CEO

April 19, 2015

President and CEO

April 19, 2015

The QEG is a parametric oscillator. There are two observations I made in regards to the operation of this device. The first is the step-down transformer configuration. This is essential for maximizing the electric current output from the device. This ratio can be expressed as 3100 turns to 350 turns or almost 10:1. In other words, the tank circuit voltage oscillates at about 10 times the output voltage. Secondly, as the rotor advances to positions #2 and #4, opposing magnetomotive forces act on the electric current in the output coils.

Both of these observations are essential ingredients for the device to operate overunity.

You can download my analysis here.

Both of these observations are essential ingredients for the device to operate overunity.

You can download my analysis here.

A paper written back in 1935 details parametric oscillation. You can download the paper here.The experimental evidence begins on page 123.

A Clear Example of Government Suppression!

A clue as to how this technology worked is shown above in the third illustration that shows a battery, a coil and an aluminum disc.

More Clues:

As stated above, back in 1956, top aerospace companies including the Lear Corporation were working on anti-gravity technology. As shown in the article on the left, researcher Dan Davidson, gave a lecture at the 2012 Extraordinary Technology Conference and mentioned the research and development done by Michigan aviation pioneer William Lear, founder of Lear Corporation. The diagram on the left shows the Wilson and Lear Antigravity Lifter and according to Dan, the test Lifter built by Lear actually levitated off the ground. Dan's DVD is available here.

William Lear stated during press conferences on February 2, 1955 in Bogotá, Colombia, and February 10, 1955 in Grand Rapids, Michigan that one of his reasons for believing in flying saucers was the existence of American research efforts into antigravity -- Dolan, Richard. M. (2002) "UFOs and the national security state: Chronology of a cover-up 1941 - 1973," ISBN 1-57174-317-0.

William Lear stated during press conferences on February 2, 1955 in Bogotá, Colombia, and February 10, 1955 in Grand Rapids, Michigan that one of his reasons for believing in flying saucers was the existence of American research efforts into antigravity -- Dolan, Richard. M. (2002) "UFOs and the national security state: Chronology of a cover-up 1941 - 1973," ISBN 1-57174-317-0.

Conclusion:

Since the early 1960's, there is little doubt the USA "Blackop" Military/Industrial Complex had anti-gravity technology perfected and deployed!

William Lear's son, John Lear talks about Lear Corporation during the 1950's:

By William S. Alek

President and CEO

November 11, 2014

President and CEO

November 11, 2014

Traveling faster than the speed of light is thought to be an impenetrable barrier. This barrier is called, “Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity.” According to his theory, it would require an infinite amount of energy to reach the speed of light. AuroraTek is developing a breakthrough technology that can “Quantum Tunnel” through this barrier and transform NEGATIVE Energy into usable energy that can safely and efficiently power our world.

The Quantum Tunneling process begins by setting up opposing forces in magnetic material, which in turn, creates Cooper Pairing between copper wire coils. A Cooper Pair is a composite boson with a total spin of integer '0':

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair

The resultant angular momentum of a Cooper Pair is effectively zero! This is why the resistance of wires containing Cooper Pairs have zero resistance because the Cooper Pair is tunneling through the barrier called, "Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity."

Now, what is so remarkable about composite boson spin '0' particles is that they have the ability to travel faster than the speed of light! This is called "Quantum Tunneling": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling

"... It is possible for spin zero particles to travel faster than the speed of light when tunnelling. ..."

The phenomenon of "Quantum Tunneling" also occurs in semiconductors called tunnel diodes and heating effects observed in large semiconductor dies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunnel_diode

Because a tunnel diode has a NEGATIVE resistance profile during their operation cycle, the diode's semiconductor material doesn't age as a typical diode age: "... Tunnel diodes are notable for their longevity, with devices made in the 1960s still functioning. Writing in Nature, Esaki and coauthors state that semiconductor devices in general are extremely stable, and suggest that their shelf life should be "infinite" if kept at room temperature. They go on to report that a small-scale test of 50-year-old devices revealed a "gratifying confirmation of the diode's longevity". As noticed on some samples of Esaki diodes, the gold plated iron pins can in fact corrode and short out to the case. This can usually be diagnosed, and the diode inside normally still works. ..."

An electron is regarded as a lepton spin '1/2' particle. Externally applied opposing magnetic forces cause two electrons to form a Cooper Pair, or:

(lepton spin '1/2') - (lepton spin '1/2') = boson spin '0' composite particle or quasiparticle.

During the tunneling process, the quasiparticle enters into Zero Time Space, which allows NEGATIVE Energy to be produced from the quasiparticle. When the quasiparticle is no longer under the influence of opposing magnetic forces, the NEGATIVE Energy produced by the quasiparticle is tranformed back into two independent electrons with POSITIVE Energy. This energy can be utilized to power our world. We call this NEGATIVE-to-POSITIVE Energy transformation "FREE Energy" or "Overunity Technology" because it has the appearance of "Nothing Is Something."

Günter Nimtz, Astrid Haibel, Ulrich Walter (Foreword by)

ISBN: 978-3-527-40735-4

166 pages

March 2008

This English edition of a successful, proven title provides a sound scientific background, while allowing a popular presentation of the physics behind the strange and mysterious tunneling process.

Based on his groundbreaking experiments, Prof Nimtz places the topic in a broader context by showing connections with other branches of physics. He and the team of authors begin by introducing such fundamental concepts as space and time and continue with tunneling phenomena from optics, nuclear and solid state physics. Avoiding mathematical equations and definitions altogether, they explain step-by-step the prerequisites for the tunnel effect to function, from classical mechanics to quantum mechanics, right up to modern topics, such as wormholes and space travel via Star Trek.

With a foreword by astronaut Ulrich Walter, science team member of the D-2 Space Shuttle Mission.

The book is available at Amazon.

By William S. Alek

President and CEO

July 15, 2014

President and CEO

July 15, 2014

The operating characteristics of traditional transformers have been well understood by mainstream science for well over a century.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer

By comparison, the Split-Flux Bifilar Transformer (SFT) developed at AuroraTek has a very different operating characteristic. Shown below is a remarkable graph that compares the operating performance of the SFT and the Traditional Transformer:

The graph shows the Voltage Current Phase Angle vs. Transformer Efficiency. You'll observe the Traditional Transformer can never exceed an efficiency of 100%. On the other hand, as the Phase Angle of the SFT approaches 90 degrees, the Efficiency reaches POSITIVE Infinity. On the other side of 90 degrees, it becomes NEGATIVE Infinity. At this point, the SFT becomes a power source, delivering power back to the generator. In other words, as the Phase Angle continues to increase, more power is being delivered back to the generator. The generator becomes a motor. Interestingly, the Efficiency curve of the SFT resembles a hyperbolic function.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer

By comparison, the Split-Flux Bifilar Transformer (SFT) developed at AuroraTek has a very different operating characteristic. Shown below is a remarkable graph that compares the operating performance of the SFT and the Traditional Transformer:

The graph shows the Voltage Current Phase Angle vs. Transformer Efficiency. You'll observe the Traditional Transformer can never exceed an efficiency of 100%. On the other hand, as the Phase Angle of the SFT approaches 90 degrees, the Efficiency reaches POSITIVE Infinity. On the other side of 90 degrees, it becomes NEGATIVE Infinity. At this point, the SFT becomes a power source, delivering power back to the generator. In other words, as the Phase Angle continues to increase, more power is being delivered back to the generator. The generator becomes a motor. Interestingly, the Efficiency curve of the SFT resembles a hyperbolic function.

By William S. Alek

President and CEO

July 14, 2014

President and CEO

July 14, 2014

Since I'm working with a
transformer, a transformer operates on AC meaning that it
operates using a sinusoid voltage. Using standard AC circuit
analysis, when power is calculated, the voltage and current are
read as RMS or Root-Mean-Square values, which yield positive
numbers. Because the transformer is an inductive device, we also
have to factor in the phase angle between the voltage and
current that is supplied to the transformer. Since the
transformer is driving a resistive load, the phase angle between
the voltage and current is always zero. The power dissipated by
the resistor is a simple RMS voltage multiplied by RMS current.
This is not the case with the input power supplied to the
transformer. Again, because the transformer is an inductive
device, there will be a phase shift between the voltage and
current and this phase shift is determined by the mutual
coupling and coil properties in the transformer. The phase angle
is ALWAYS less than 90 degrees for a traditional transformer.
Therefore, to determine the REAL power being delivered to the
transformer we must take the cosine of the phase angle. The
diagram below shows how this done:

As long as the phase angle is less than 90 degrees for a traditional transformer, the resulting efficiency will always be a positive number and less than 100%.

This is NOT the case for the Split-Flux Transformer (SFT) used by the SmartPAK system. Given a special condition where the SFT output is shorted, the input phase angle can and does exceed 90 degrees! When you compute the cosine of this angle, the resulting value is NEGATIVE and this is how we get a NEGATIVE Efficiency.

As long as the phase angle is less than 90 degrees for a traditional transformer, the resulting efficiency will always be a positive number and less than 100%.

This is NOT the case for the Split-Flux Transformer (SFT) used by the SmartPAK system. Given a special condition where the SFT output is shorted, the input phase angle can and does exceed 90 degrees! When you compute the cosine of this angle, the resulting value is NEGATIVE and this is how we get a NEGATIVE Efficiency.

What this means is the SFT is acting as a source of power, sending power back to the generator - this phenomenon is unheard-of in the electrical engineering world without question!

By William S. Alek

President and CEO

March 16, 2014

President and CEO

March 16, 2014

Knowing this answer is the KEY! A KEY to liberating humanity from artificial scarcity brought about by The Matrix, the system in which we ALL live.

What Causes Superconductivity?

A key observation in this article about Superconductivity is the following "... the crucial realization is that superconductivity is associated with a bound pair of electrons, each having equal but opposite spin and angular momentum, traveling through the metal ..." This is also known as "Cooper Pairing."

The key is opposite spin and angular momentum! Because of opposite spin and angular momentum, the spin and angular momentum of the pair CANCEL. The pair loses it's inertia and effectively DECOUPLEs from the inertial field - the pair moves in the metal with NO resistance. In other words, the metal has NO electrical resistance and becomes an "ideal conductor" of electricity.

An almost identical effect occurs in the SFT or Split-Flux Transformer with one important difference. The SFT becomes a Superconductor at ROOM TEMPERATURE! This is how its done:

You'll observe in the diagram above that electrons with opposite spin and angular momentum form "Cooper Pairs" due to lattice forces of the metal. The phenomena can only occur when the metal is conducting current at very cold temperatures (i.e., when cooled with liquid nitrogen). Above that critical temperature, phonon interaction breaks up the pairing of the electrons. Each electron now has spin and angular momentum. Thus, connecting each individual electron to the inertial field giving the metal electrical resistance.

In the SFT or Split-Flux Transformer, a similar action occurs. Because there are two output coils wired in a bifilar configuration, identical output current flows, but in opposite direction. An opposing magnetomotive force is created causing "Cooper Pairs" to form as shown above. This phenomenon occurs below, at or above room-temperature. The SFT effectively becomes a Superconductor at any temperature! How do we know this phenomena is occurring? Because the primary input coil becomes an "Ideal Inductor." In other words, the phase angle between the voltage and current approaches 90 degrees. I can easily demonstrate this phenomena. NO practical transformer on Earth can do this except the SFT!!! What this means is the SFT driving a REAL load consumes NO REAL power, or Pin -> 0 Watts! The ultimate overall efficiency of the SFT is nearly infinite!

So, imagine that - nearly Infinite efficiency! This is critical for understanding gravity and how this device interacts with gravity due to the inertialess reaction of "Cooper Pairs." Counter-rotating opposing magnetic fields is the KEY towards building antigravity technologies. The craft is essentially transformed into a macroscopic "Cooper Pair," DECOUPLED from the inertial field. FREE Energy is a byproduct of the process.

In my opinion, this is perhaps the GREATEST invention of the century, perhaps ever! Because it can transform and replace The Matrix.

What Causes Superconductivity?

A key observation in this article about Superconductivity is the following "... the crucial realization is that superconductivity is associated with a bound pair of electrons, each having equal but opposite spin and angular momentum, traveling through the metal ..." This is also known as "Cooper Pairing."

The key is opposite spin and angular momentum! Because of opposite spin and angular momentum, the spin and angular momentum of the pair CANCEL. The pair loses it's inertia and effectively DECOUPLEs from the inertial field - the pair moves in the metal with NO resistance. In other words, the metal has NO electrical resistance and becomes an "ideal conductor" of electricity.

An almost identical effect occurs in the SFT or Split-Flux Transformer with one important difference. The SFT becomes a Superconductor at ROOM TEMPERATURE! This is how its done:

You'll observe in the diagram above that electrons with opposite spin and angular momentum form "Cooper Pairs" due to lattice forces of the metal. The phenomena can only occur when the metal is conducting current at very cold temperatures (i.e., when cooled with liquid nitrogen). Above that critical temperature, phonon interaction breaks up the pairing of the electrons. Each electron now has spin and angular momentum. Thus, connecting each individual electron to the inertial field giving the metal electrical resistance.

In the SFT or Split-Flux Transformer, a similar action occurs. Because there are two output coils wired in a bifilar configuration, identical output current flows, but in opposite direction. An opposing magnetomotive force is created causing "Cooper Pairs" to form as shown above. This phenomenon occurs below, at or above room-temperature. The SFT effectively becomes a Superconductor at any temperature! How do we know this phenomena is occurring? Because the primary input coil becomes an "Ideal Inductor." In other words, the phase angle between the voltage and current approaches 90 degrees. I can easily demonstrate this phenomena. NO practical transformer on Earth can do this except the SFT!!! What this means is the SFT driving a REAL load consumes NO REAL power, or Pin -> 0 Watts! The ultimate overall efficiency of the SFT is nearly infinite!

So, imagine that - nearly Infinite efficiency! This is critical for understanding gravity and how this device interacts with gravity due to the inertialess reaction of "Cooper Pairs." Counter-rotating opposing magnetic fields is the KEY towards building antigravity technologies. The craft is essentially transformed into a macroscopic "Cooper Pair," DECOUPLED from the inertial field. FREE Energy is a byproduct of the process.

In my opinion, this is perhaps the GREATEST invention of the century, perhaps ever! Because it can transform and replace The Matrix.

By William S. Alek

President and CEO

January 11, 2014

President and CEO

January 11, 2014

The chart below shows details about how to measure transformer efficiency:

Some of you may immediately notice this is "classic" AC Circuit Analysis - nothing special, which is absolutely correct. What I do is simply plug-in a four-terminal "classic" transformer indicated above as D.U.T. or Device Under Test. What we're interested is the power-in vs. the power-out characteristics of the device at a given frequency of operation. We want the RMS or Root-Mean-Square value of the current and voltage and secondly, we MUST use a sinusoidal wave. In other words, the operation of the transformer is WITHIN or BELOW the saturation level of the magnetic core material the transformer is made out of. The core material could be silicon steel, permalloy or metglas, for example. The input impedance, output impedance as well as the mutual coupling between the input and output all play a role in regards to the overall efficiency of the transformer. We also need the phase shift between the input voltage and input current. Since we're driving a resistive load on the output, the output phase shift is zero degrees, which makes the output power calculation simple.

Now, as I stated at CES, "classic" transformers ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS test underunity. In other words, their efficiency is ALWAYS under 100%. It's HOW they're built. Transformer physics is a well understood science and known for over 140 years. They're used everywhere - step-up / step-down, etc, etc. "Classic" transformer physics clearly shows us underunity - no BIG deal.

So, how is it when I build one of my transformers (Split-Flux Transformer or SFT) - oops, the efficiency measures over 100%??? There MUST be something wrong somewhere??? Let me check my hookups - no, no problem there. Let me check my calculations - no, no problem there either. Hmmmmmmmm, what is going on here??? Why is it when I build one of my "special" transformers, the efficiency is over 100% and the it's producing more power out than power in??? Doesn't that "violate" God's Law (2nd Law) of Thermodynamics??? How is that possible I ask??? There MUST be something else going on here - well, guess what, there is.

The diagram below shows a comparison between a "classic" transformer (LEFT) and my "1st Generation" SFT transformer (RIGHT). All the measurements use RMS values read by Fluke Meters and a Fluke Scopemeter I have at my disposal. A "Hall-Effect" sensor is used to measure the input phase shift difference between the current and voltage when connected to the Fluke Scopemeter. Since our input is inductive, the current will ALWAYS lags the voltage:

Observe carefully the efficiency of these transformers? The "Classic" transformer has a typical efficiency of 85% - normal, nothing special. However, the SFT has an efficiency of 129%!!! Impossible you say??? Think again.

If you would like a "personal" demo of our tech, please feel free to contact us at: 480-474-4388

Again, we're looking for investment, sales representation, and distribution channels of our tech.

Some of you may immediately notice this is "classic" AC Circuit Analysis - nothing special, which is absolutely correct. What I do is simply plug-in a four-terminal "classic" transformer indicated above as D.U.T. or Device Under Test. What we're interested is the power-in vs. the power-out characteristics of the device at a given frequency of operation. We want the RMS or Root-Mean-Square value of the current and voltage and secondly, we MUST use a sinusoidal wave. In other words, the operation of the transformer is WITHIN or BELOW the saturation level of the magnetic core material the transformer is made out of. The core material could be silicon steel, permalloy or metglas, for example. The input impedance, output impedance as well as the mutual coupling between the input and output all play a role in regards to the overall efficiency of the transformer. We also need the phase shift between the input voltage and input current. Since we're driving a resistive load on the output, the output phase shift is zero degrees, which makes the output power calculation simple.

Now, as I stated at CES, "classic" transformers ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS test underunity. In other words, their efficiency is ALWAYS under 100%. It's HOW they're built. Transformer physics is a well understood science and known for over 140 years. They're used everywhere - step-up / step-down, etc, etc. "Classic" transformer physics clearly shows us underunity - no BIG deal.

So, how is it when I build one of my transformers (Split-Flux Transformer or SFT) - oops, the efficiency measures over 100%??? There MUST be something wrong somewhere??? Let me check my hookups - no, no problem there. Let me check my calculations - no, no problem there either. Hmmmmmmmm, what is going on here??? Why is it when I build one of my "special" transformers, the efficiency is over 100% and the it's producing more power out than power in??? Doesn't that "violate" God's Law (2nd Law) of Thermodynamics??? How is that possible I ask??? There MUST be something else going on here - well, guess what, there is.

The diagram below shows a comparison between a "classic" transformer (LEFT) and my "1st Generation" SFT transformer (RIGHT). All the measurements use RMS values read by Fluke Meters and a Fluke Scopemeter I have at my disposal. A "Hall-Effect" sensor is used to measure the input phase shift difference between the current and voltage when connected to the Fluke Scopemeter. Since our input is inductive, the current will ALWAYS lags the voltage:

Observe carefully the efficiency of these transformers? The "Classic" transformer has a typical efficiency of 85% - normal, nothing special. However, the SFT has an efficiency of 129%!!! Impossible you say??? Think again.

If you would like a "personal" demo of our tech, please feel free to contact us at: 480-474-4388

Again, we're looking for investment, sales representation, and distribution channels of our tech.

Checkout my research website by clicking on the image below:

Content copyright . auroratek.us. All rights reserved.